Is God Great?
Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1p1mDPQw1Yk
Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox
Re: Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox
Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxF73wIcrjw
The argumentation of Lennox is absolutely hilarious, ..., or deeply sad, any which way you choose
It is worth watching though how Dawkins keeps answering with patience and respect, and leaves nothing whole from the man at the same time
It's remarkable to see how he keeps putting his energy in these non-debates. There is no case, and there is also no point in trying to convince religious people to let go, as there is an infinite replenishment of non-arguments. Whenever there is proof that one argument is invalid, another pops up or the story changes, or suddenly the writings must no longer be taken literally
But still, these are just debates with religious people that still are convinced that evolution is true.
If we go into debates with creationists, we really cannot take any one of those serious. So we could not even call it a debate in the first place
I'm not sure you need to be an atheist to accept evolution, but from this debate it is very strange to see someone accepting evolution, then doubting the first cause, and then leaping from that to a personal god, that became human, and died here on earth. I think I would not be able to live with this kind of twisted reasoning going through my head. Also he keep mammling about evidence... What evidence is he talking about? Would he even know what that word means? I would say, stick to mathematics John ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxF73wIcrjw
The argumentation of Lennox is absolutely hilarious, ..., or deeply sad, any which way you choose
It is worth watching though how Dawkins keeps answering with patience and respect, and leaves nothing whole from the man at the same time
It's remarkable to see how he keeps putting his energy in these non-debates. There is no case, and there is also no point in trying to convince religious people to let go, as there is an infinite replenishment of non-arguments. Whenever there is proof that one argument is invalid, another pops up or the story changes, or suddenly the writings must no longer be taken literally
But still, these are just debates with religious people that still are convinced that evolution is true.
If we go into debates with creationists, we really cannot take any one of those serious. So we could not even call it a debate in the first place
I'm not sure you need to be an atheist to accept evolution, but from this debate it is very strange to see someone accepting evolution, then doubting the first cause, and then leaping from that to a personal god, that became human, and died here on earth. I think I would not be able to live with this kind of twisted reasoning going through my head. Also he keep mammling about evidence... What evidence is he talking about? Would he even know what that word means? I would say, stick to mathematics John ...
Re: Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox
Does God exist debate Christopher Hitchens vs Craig at Biola
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxvalmFOgAc
"Prove to me that atheism is true" ... lol, can't these guys really do better? What kind of question is that
I'm trying to dig up the best debates on the subject, but currently failing at finding worthy opponents. Sorry about that
I'll keep looking
"They will be judged based on the information they had at the time" ...
"All evidence tonight has been on one side of the scale" ...
Now there is the only statement I can agree on 
"Being an atheist your life has no meaning, and no purpose, and therefore god must be true"
come on, Craig, you can do better than that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxvalmFOgAc
"Prove to me that atheism is true" ... lol, can't these guys really do better? What kind of question is that

I'm trying to dig up the best debates on the subject, but currently failing at finding worthy opponents. Sorry about that
I'll keep looking
"They will be judged based on the information they had at the time" ...

"All evidence tonight has been on one side of the scale" ...


"Being an atheist your life has no meaning, and no purpose, and therefore god must be true"

Re: Christopher Hitchens vs John Lennox
Craig vs Dawkins (first part is in Spanish, you can skip that ... unless you know the language)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uaq6ORDx1C4
Craig : "Evil is in fact proof there is a god" ... Let's ride
"about the central questions of life, you should believe, what you believe" ... phiew, now i'm convinced
Dawkins "Children mostly grow out of this purposive way of looking at the world, but apparently not everybody does"
"Just try on the atheist cap for an hour or so, pretend there is no god, and you will see nothing will change, you will still have purpose in life, doing the things you do, anyway"
Michiu Kaku " After such a great introduction, I can't wait to hear the speaker myself"
This was actually a good debate
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uaq6ORDx1C4
Craig : "Evil is in fact proof there is a god" ... Let's ride
"about the central questions of life, you should believe, what you believe" ... phiew, now i'm convinced
Dawkins "Children mostly grow out of this purposive way of looking at the world, but apparently not everybody does"
"Just try on the atheist cap for an hour or so, pretend there is no god, and you will see nothing will change, you will still have purpose in life, doing the things you do, anyway"
Michiu Kaku " After such a great introduction, I can't wait to hear the speaker myself"
This was actually a good debate
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest